Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控
VS
Regions BankRegions Bank
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

No.237, Sec. 1, Jianguo S. Rd., Da’an Dist.,, Taipei City, 10657, TW

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile

以「成為亞洲一流的金融機構」為發展願景的富邦金控,旗下主要子公司包括富邦人壽、台北富邦銀行、富邦銀行(香港)、富邦華一銀行、富邦產險、富邦證券及富邦投信等,擁有最完整多元的金融產品與服務,經營績效耀眼,位居市場領導地位。富邦金控深耕台灣逾60年,以「正向力量 成就可能™」為品牌理念,致力以正向的力量及全方位的金融服務,支持人們追尋美好未來。 截至2025年6月底,富邦金控總資產達11兆9,021億元,為台灣總資產第二大、市值第一大金融控股公司,2025年上半年稅後淨利為513.84億元,每股盈餘(EPS) 3.49元。富邦金控已連續...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:2,494
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Regions Bank

Regions Bank

1900 5th Ave N, Birmingham, Alabama, US, 35203

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

Regions Financial Corporation is a member of the S&P 500 Index and is one of the nation’s largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services. Regions serves customers across the South, Midwest and Tex...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:22,536
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Regions Bank

Regions Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regions Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Regions Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regions Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Regions Bank

Regions Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG255072825

FAQ

Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 company and Regions Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 and Regions Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 and Regions Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 or Regions Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 or Regions Bank ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 and Regions Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 and Regions Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA