Comparison Overview
FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business

FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business
4th Floor, London, EC4M 7LS, GB
Last Update: 14/03/2026
FTSE Russell is a leading global provider of index and benchmark solutions, spanning diverse asset classes and investment objectives. As a trusted investment partner, we help investors make better-informed investment decisions, manage risk, and seize opportunities. In...

Broadridge
605 3rd Ave, 41st Floor, New York, New York, US, 10158
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE: BR) is a global technology leader with the trusted expertise and transformative technology to help clients and the financial services industry operate, innovate, and grow. We power investing, governance, and communications for our c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business







Broadridge






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Broadridge in 2026.
Incident History - FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Broadridge (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Broadridge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

FTSE Russell, An LSEG Business

Broadridge
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.