Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FTI-AnderschFTI-Andersch
VS
McKinsey & CompanyMcKinsey & Company
FTI-Andersch

FTI-Andersch

Taunusanlage 9-10, Frankfurt, 60329, DE

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
752/1000Fair

FTI-Andersch ist die führende Beratung im Bereich Turnaround in Deutschland und Teil der internationalen FTI Consulting Gruppe. Wir sind spezialisiert auf die nachhaltige Bewältigung schwierigster Unternehmenssituationen und die Umsetzung komplexer Transformationsprozes...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:188
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mckinsey.com
815/1000Good

McKinsey & Company is a global management consulting firm. We are the trusted advisor to the world's leading businesses, governments, and institutions. We work with leading organizations across the private, public and social sectors. Our scale, scope, and knowledge ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:38,633
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FTI-Andersch

FTI-Andersch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FTI-Andersch in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

McKinsey & Company has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - FTI-Andersch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FTI-Andersch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McKinsey & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinsey & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FTI-Andersch

FTI-Andersch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McKinsey & Company

McKinsey & Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCK1773109656

FAQ

Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FTI-Andersch company and McKinsey & Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FTI-Andersch and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FTI-Andersch and McKinsey & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FTI-Andersch or McKinsey & Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FTI-Andersch or McKinsey & Company ?
Between FTI-Andersch and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FTI-Andersch and McKinsey & Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2