Comparison Overview
uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences

uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences
N/A
Last Update: 30/03/2026
La Faculté des sciences de la santé de l'Université d'Ottawa se distingue par la diversité de ses cinq écoles spécialisées : l'École interdisciplinaire des sciences de la santé, l'École des sciences de l'activité physique, l'École des sciences infirmières, l'École des s...

Deakin University
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences







Deakin University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.
Incident History - uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

uOttawa | Faculté des sciences de la santé | Faculty of Health Sciences

Deakin University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.