Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices RecognitionFrost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition
VS
StantecStantec
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

San Antonio, US

Last Update: 02/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frost.com
753/1000Fair

Frost & Sullivan leverages a global team of industry experts to support clients in their growth objectives and identify business opportunities through research and consulting services.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stantec

Stantec

10160-112 Street, Edmonton, T5K 2L6, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stantec.com
779/1000Fair

Stantec empowers clients, people, and communities to rise to the world’s greatest challenges at a time when the world faces more unprecedented concerns than ever before. We are a global leader in sustainable engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting. Ou...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:31,451
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stantec

Stantec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stantec in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stantec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stantec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stantec

Stantec

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Stantec company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Stantec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Stantec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or Stantec ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or Stantec ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Stantec, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Stantec, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-77648
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Glance through 32.0.0, the /v2/tasks API accepts type=import tasks that bypass import_filtering_opts, allowing an admin to fetch internal URLs from the Glance service network (aka SSRF), as long as https:// or http:// is used. This API has been available only to admins since Xena, and it has been deprecated for several releases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.7
CVE-2026-77647
SUMMARY

SPIP before 4.4.20 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, as exploited in the wild in August 2026. This is related to incorrect identification of <?php blocks, and var_export's mishandling of certain cases such as presence of a '<' character.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-77113
SUMMARY

Path traversal in apport-unpack in Canonical Apport before 2.36.0, 2.34.2, and 2.28.4 on Linux allows an attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the executing user via an attacker controlled key names in crash report files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77646
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill PDMLink and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-77645
SUMMARY

A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill and PTC FlexPLM. The vulnerability may be exploited through the deserialization of untrusted data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-20
UPDATED
Date2026-08-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Red
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA