Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices RecognitionFrost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition
VS
EXLEXL
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

San Antonio, US

Last Update: 02/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frost.com
753/1000Fair

Frost & Sullivan leverages a global team of industry experts to support clients in their growth objectives and identify business opportunities through research and consulting services.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EXL

EXL

320 Park Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, NY, US, 10022

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.exlservice.com
768/1000Fair

Choosing a digital partner is about more than capabilities — it’s about collaboration and character. Unrealistic overhauls and off-the-shelf products ignore what matters most — your unique needs, culture, goals, and your legacy data and technology environments. At EXL...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:50,357
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EXL

EXL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EXL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EXL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EXL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EXL

EXL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and EXL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and EXL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and EXL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or EXL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or EXL ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and EXL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and EXL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929
SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-76928
SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-76927
SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-76926
SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-76924
SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES