Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices RecognitionFrost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition
VS
DeloitteDeloitte
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

San Antonio, US

Last Update: 02/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frost.com
753/1000Fair

Frost & Sullivan leverages a global team of industry experts to support clients in their growth objectives and identify business opportunities through research and consulting services.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deloitte

Deloitte

Worldwide, Worldwide, OO

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deloitte.com/
809/1000Good

Deloitte drives progress. Our firms around the world help clients become leaders wherever they choose to compete. Deloitte invests in outstanding people of diverse talents and backgrounds and empowers them to achieve more than they could elsewhere. Our work combines adv...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:516,523
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deloitte

Deloitte

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Deloitte has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deloitte (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deloitte cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deloitte

Deloitte

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1781000708
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQU1774671948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEL3932939091625

FAQ

Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition company and Deloitte company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Deloitte, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Deloitte, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or Deloitte ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition or Deloitte ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Deloitte, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Recognition and Deloitte, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929
SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-76928
SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-76927
SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-76926
SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-76924
SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-19
UPDATED
Date2026-08-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8