Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

frigemo agfrigemo ag
VS
McCain FoodsMcCain Foods
frigemo ag

frigemo ag

Route de Neuchâtel 49, Cressier NE, 2088, CH

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.frigemo.ch
748/1000Moderate

Natürlich frischer. Unsere Lebensmittelprodukte und Dienstleistungen zeichnen sich durch hohe und zuverlässige Qualitätsanforderungen aus, welche anspruchsvollen Bedürfnissen entsprechen. Wir sind Spezialisten für tiefgekühlte Kartoffel- und Gemüseprodukte, Salate und E...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:139
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
McCain Foods

McCain Foods

439 King Street West, Toronto, ON, CA, M5V 1K4

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mccain.com
780/1000Fair

At McCain, we believe food plays an important role in people’s lives, with the power to bring individuals, families, and communities together. As a privately owned family company with over 67 years of experience, a presence in over 160 countries, and a global team of...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:11,675
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
frigemo ag

frigemo ag

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
McCain Foods

McCain Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for frigemo ag in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCain Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - frigemo ag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

frigemo ag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - McCain Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCain Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
frigemo ag

frigemo ag

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
McCain Foods

McCain Foods

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between frigemo ag company and McCain Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between frigemo ag and McCain Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between frigemo ag and McCain Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - frigemo ag or McCain Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - frigemo ag or McCain Foods ?
Between frigemo ag and McCain Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between frigemo ag and McCain Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8