Comparison Overview

Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home

VS

Tate

Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hildene.org

Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home (Friends of Hildene, Inc.) is a nonprofit 501c3 based in Manchester, Vermont, dedicated to carrying on the values of Abraham Lincoln by educating and inspiring others to put those values into action. The estate consists of a house museum (built by presidential son Robert Lincoln and his wife Mary Harlan Lincoln in 1905), restored Pullman Palace railcar "Sunbeam," engaging exhibits, working farm and cheesemaking facility, formal and production gardens, 12 miles of trails and year-round programming for adults and children.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tate

Millbank, London, England, SW1P 4RG, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tate.org.uk

Our mission is to increase the public’s enjoyment and understanding of art. When Tate first opened its doors to the public in 1897 it had just one gallery, displaying a small collection of British artworks. Today we have four major galleries and the national collection of British art from 1500 to the present day and international modern and contemporary art, which includes nearly 80,000 artworks. Tate is a public institution owned by, and existing for, the public.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,669
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-hildene.jpeg
Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2026.

Incident History — Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-hildene.jpeg
Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tate company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tate company and Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tate company nor Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tate company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tate company nor Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company nor Tate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company.

Tate company employs more people globally than Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hildene, The Lincoln Family Home nor Tate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References