Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FriendFinder Networks Inc.FriendFinder Networks Inc.
VS
EntainEntain
FriendFinder Networks Inc.

FriendFinder Networks Inc.

1615 S Congress Ave, Delray Beach, 33445, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.ffn.com
601/1000Poor

FriendFinder Networks is an international leader in social media founded in 1996 by Andrew Conru. Originally started as a main-stream social networking site, the company quickly adapted to consumer preferences, and branched out into different social media verticals. An...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:129
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Entain

Entain

London, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://EntainGroup.com
780/1000Fair

Welcome to Entain. Our journey as Entain began when we evolved from GVC Holdings on 9th December 2020, but our brands have been paving the way and making history since the 1880s. Today, we’re one of the world’s largest sports betting and gaming entertainment groups ...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:18,640
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FriendFinder Networks Inc.

FriendFinder Networks Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Entain

Entain

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FriendFinder Networks Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Entain in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FriendFinder Networks Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FriendFinder Networks Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Entain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Entain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FriendFinder Networks Inc.

FriendFinder Networks Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TENMYSTWITENCANADODEEFRIUNIBRA1769520245
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRI22551123
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRI440080525
Entain

Entain

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. company and Entain company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Entain, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Entain, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FriendFinder Networks Inc. or Entain ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FriendFinder Networks Inc. or Entain ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Entain, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Entain, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2