Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Freyssinet, Inc. - USAFreyssinet, Inc. - USA
VS
SkanskaSkanska
Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

44880 Falcon Pl, Sterling, Virginia, 20166, US

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.freyssinetusa.com
750/1000Fair

Freyssinet, Inc. has been at the forefront of providing specialized civil engineering technology, material supply, and installation for projects large and small. We form part of The Soletanche Freyssinet Group, a name respected worldwide for delivering innovative solu...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Skanska

Skanska

Warfvinges väg 25 (Group Headquarters), Stockholm, SE, SE-112 74

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.skanska.com
782/1000Fair

Skanska Group uses knowledge & foresight to shape the way people live, work, and connect. More than 138 years in the making, we’re one of the world’s largest development and construction companies, with 2024 revenue totaling SEK 177 billion. We operate in select markets...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:23,492
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Skanska

Skanska

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Freyssinet, Inc. - USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Skanska in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Freyssinet, Inc. - USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Freyssinet, Inc. - USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Skanska (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Skanska cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

Freyssinet, Inc. - USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Skanska

Skanska

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA company and Skanska company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA and Skanska, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Freyssinet, Inc. - USA or Skanska ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Freyssinet, Inc. - USA or Skanska ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA and Skanska, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Freyssinet, Inc. - USA and Skanska, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3