Comparison Overview
Fresh Mango Technologies (UK)
Fresh Mango Technologies (UK)
Unit 3, Manor Court, Leeds, LS11 8LQ, GB
Last Update: 05/12/2025
Fresh Mango UK is an IT Support and cybersecurity provider that has been successfully providing computer and IT support services in the United Kingdom for over 25 years. With offices in Leeds, Ripon and Skipton, we are well placed to service customers requiring IT Suppo...
FPT Software
FPT Bld., Duy Tan Str., Hanoi, 10xxx15xx, VN
Last Update: 05/09/2026
FPT Software, a subsidiary of FPT Corporation, is a global technology and IT services provider headquartered in Vietnam, with USD 1.22 billion in revenue (2024) and over 33,000 employees in 30 countries. Embracing an AI-first approach, FPT Software enables breakthroug...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Fresh Mango Technologies (UK)
FPT Software
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fresh Mango Technologies (UK) in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FPT Software in 2026.
Incident History - Fresh Mango Technologies (UK) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fresh Mango Technologies (UK) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - FPT Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FPT Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Fresh Mango Technologies (UK)
FPT Software
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.