Comparison Overview

Fresenius Group

VS

Massachusetts General Hospital

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, DE, 61352
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024, Fresenius generated €21.5 billion in annual revenue with around 176,000 employees (excluding Fresenius Medical Care). As a healthcare company focused on therapy, Fresenius offers system-critical products and services for leading therapies for the care of critically and chronically ill patients. Why work for Fresenius? At Fresenius, your career has purpose. As a global healthcare group, we’re dedicated to improving the lives of millions through better medicine—and we’re looking for people who want to make a real impact. Whether you’re an engineer, nurse, scientist, or business expert, Fresenius offers diverse career opportunities, the chance to grow across disciplines, and the satisfaction of contributing to something that truly matters. ➡ Learn more: careers.fresenius.com ➡ Follow us on Instagram: www.instagram.com/fresenius.group Imprint: https://www.fresenius.com/Imprint Data protection: https://www.fresenius.com/data-protection

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,137
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Massachusetts General Hospital

55 Fruit Street, None, Boston, MA, US, 02114
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Guided by the needs of our patients and their families, Massachusetts General Hospital aims to deliver the very best health care in a safe, compassionate environment; to advance that care through innovative research and education; and, to improve the health and well-being of the diverse communities we serve. Visit our careers page! http://www.mghcareers.org

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,915
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fresenius Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Massachusetts General Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts General Hospital in 2025.

Incident History — Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Massachusetts General Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts General Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Computer virus outbreak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fresenius Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Massachusetts General Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Fresenius Group company.

In the current year, Massachusetts General Hospital company and Fresenius Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Fresenius Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Massachusetts General Hospital company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Fresenius Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital company nor Fresenius Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group company nor Massachusetts General Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fresenius Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Massachusetts General Hospital company.

Massachusetts General Hospital company employs more people globally than Fresenius Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Massachusetts General Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H