Comparison Overview

Fresenius Group

VS

Inova Health

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, DE, 61352
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024, Fresenius generated €21.5 billion in annual revenue with around 176,000 employees (excluding Fresenius Medical Care). As a healthcare company focused on therapy, Fresenius offers system-critical products and services for leading therapies for the care of critically and chronically ill patients. Why work for Fresenius? At Fresenius, your career has purpose. As a global healthcare group, we’re dedicated to improving the lives of millions through better medicine—and we’re looking for people who want to make a real impact. Whether you’re an engineer, nurse, scientist, or business expert, Fresenius offers diverse career opportunities, the chance to grow across disciplines, and the satisfaction of contributing to something that truly matters. ➡ Learn more: careers.fresenius.com ➡ Follow us on Instagram: www.instagram.com/fresenius.group Imprint: https://www.fresenius.com/Imprint Data protection: https://www.fresenius.com/data-protection

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,137
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Inova Health

3300 Gallows Road, Falls Church, Virginia, US, 22042
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We are Inova, Northern Virginia and the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area’s leading nonprofit healthcare provider. With expertise and compassion, we partner with our patients to help them stay healthy. We treat illness, heal injury and look at a patient’s whole health to help them flourish. Through our expansive network of hospitals, primary and specialty care practices, emergency and urgent care centers, and outpatient services, Inova provides care for more than 1 million unique patients every year. Total patient visits exceed 4 million annually, demonstrating our ability to deliver the best clinical care and ensuring a seamless experience for all who rely on us for their healthcare needs. Consistently ranked and recognized as a national healthcare leader in safety, quality and patient experience, Inova’s world-class care is made possible by the strength and breadth of our network, our 26,000 team members, our technology and our innovation. In 2025, Inova was named the Health System of the Year by Press Ganey, a national leader in healthcare experience, recognizing our excellence in patient care, team member engagement, and commitment to continuous improvement. Inova is home to Northern Virginia’s only Level 1 Trauma Center and Level 4 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and provides high-quality healthcare to each person in every community we are privileged to serve – regardless of ability to pay – every day of their life. More information about Inova can be found at www.inova.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,053
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inovahealth.jpeg
Inova Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fresenius Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inova Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inova Health in 2025.

Incident History — Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inova Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inova Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Computer virus outbreak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inovahealth.jpeg
Inova Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fresenius Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inova Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fresenius Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Inova Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, Inova Health company and Fresenius Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Fresenius Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Inova Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Inova Health company nor Fresenius Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inova Health company nor Fresenius Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group company nor Inova Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fresenius Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Inova Health company.

Fresenius Group company employs more people globally than Inova Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Inova Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N