Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, SingaporeFresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore
VS
CiplaCipla
Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

238A Thomson Road , #24-03/05 Novena Square Tower A, 307684, SG

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
805/1000Good

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cipla

Cipla

Lower Parel, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400013

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cipla.com
782/1000Fair

Cipla is a leading global pharmaceutical company trusted by healthcare professionals and patients across the world since 1935. A compassionate approach to healthcare that goes beyond the pursuit of profit and growth has been the force impelling Cipla’s history over the ...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:50,326
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cipla

Cipla

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cipla in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cipla (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cipla cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cipla

Cipla

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore company and Cipla company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore and Cipla, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore and Cipla, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore or Cipla ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore or Cipla ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore and Cipla, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fresenius Kabi (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Singapore and Cipla, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1