Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fresenius Kabi PortugalFresenius Kabi Portugal
VS
Ipca Laboratories LimitedIpca Laboratories Limited
Fresenius Kabi Portugal

Fresenius Kabi Portugal

Zona Industrial do Lagedo, Santiago de Besteiros, 3465-157, PT

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Como empresa global de cuidados de saúde, a Fresenius Kabi está Comprometida com a Vida. Os nossos produtos, tecnologias e serviços destinam-se ao tratamento de doentes críticos e crónicos. Com mais de 43.000 colaboradores e presença em mais de 100 países, o nosso vasto...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:134
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ipca Laboratories Limited

Ipca Laboratories Limited

125 Kandivli Industrial Estate, Kandivli (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400067

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ipca.com/
768/1000Fair

A consumer-led global pharmaceutical company, creating healthy doses of life since 1949. When you operate in an industry like pharmaceuticals, your work goes way beyond creating ‘products for customers’. It is different from any other domain – there lies a higher sense...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:13,559
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fresenius Kabi Portugal

Fresenius Kabi Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ipca Laboratories Limited

Ipca Laboratories Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Kabi Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ipca Laboratories Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fresenius Kabi Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Kabi Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ipca Laboratories Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ipca Laboratories Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fresenius Kabi Portugal

Fresenius Kabi Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ipca Laboratories Limited

Ipca Laboratories Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal company and Ipca Laboratories Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal and Ipca Laboratories Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal and Ipca Laboratories Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fresenius Kabi Portugal or Ipca Laboratories Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fresenius Kabi Portugal or Ipca Laboratories Limited ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal and Ipca Laboratories Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fresenius Kabi Portugal and Ipca Laboratories Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA