Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fresenius Investor RelationsFresenius Investor Relations
VS
IQVIAIQVIA
Fresenius Investor Relations

Fresenius Investor Relations

Else-Kröner-Strasse 1, 61352, Bad Homburg v.d.H., DE

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Professionalism – Excellence – Integrity – Transparency: The objective of Investor Relations is to achieve an appropriate valuation of the Fresenius-stock by the capital market. Imprint: www.fresenius.com/Imprint

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IQVIA

IQVIA

2400 Ellis Rd, Durham, 27703, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.iqvia.com/
754/1000Fair

IQVIA (NYSE:IQV) is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. IQVIA’s portfolio of solutions are powered by IQVIA Connected Intelligence™ to deliver actionable...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:80,729
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fresenius Investor Relations

Fresenius Investor Relations

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IQVIA

IQVIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Investor Relations in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IQVIA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fresenius Investor Relations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Investor Relations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IQVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IQVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fresenius Investor Relations

Fresenius Investor Relations

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IQVIA

IQVIA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IQV125614222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ERT18610523
🔒 Incident : Breach
FINIQV1772483878

FAQ

Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations company and IQVIA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations and IQVIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations and IQVIA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fresenius Investor Relations or IQVIA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fresenius Investor Relations or IQVIA ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations and IQVIA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fresenius Investor Relations and IQVIA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8