Comparison Overview

Free Russia Foundation

VS

International Rescue Committee

Free Russia Foundation

1015 15 Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 650 and 699

The Free Russia Foundation is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, nongovernmental U.S.-based organization, led by Russians abroad that seeks to be a voice for those who can’t speak under the repression of the current Russian leadership. We represent and coordinate the Russia diaspora. We pay special attention to those who have recently left Russia due to the considerable deterioration of the political and economic situation. We are focused on developing a strategic vision of Russia 'After Putin’ and ‘Without Putinism’ and concrete program for the transition period. We will continue to inform international policy-makers, mass media and opinion leaders on the real situation in Russia. We know firsthand the reality taking place in our country, and have suffered for this; therefore we understand this better than many other people. We maintain our extensive networks of key political, business and civil society leaders throughout Russia. This gives us access to news and events in real time. In addition, we are a hub for recently transplanted Russians and experts on every aspect of Russian society.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

International Rescue Committee

122 E 42st , New York, 10168, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 800 and 849

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees and displaced people forced to flee from war or disaster. At work today in over 50+ countries and in 28 U.S. cities, the IRC restores safety, dignity and hope to millions who are uprooted and struggling to endure.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,319
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/free-russia-foundation.jpeg
Free Russia Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Free Russia Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Rescue Committee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

Free Russia Foundation has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Rescue Committee in 2025.

Incident History — Free Russia Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Free Russia Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Rescue Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Rescue Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/free-russia-foundation.jpeg
Free Russia Foundation
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious LNK file (masquerading as PDF), weaponized ZIP archive, PowerShell script execution, Tor hidden service, OpenSSH backdoor
Motivation: espionage, military intelligence gathering, potential sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing emails
Motivation: Data theft, system monitoring
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Rescue Committee company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Free Russia Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Free Russia Foundation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas International Rescue Committee company has not reported any.

In the current year, Free Russia Foundation company has reported more cyber incidents than International Rescue Committee company.

Free Russia Foundation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while International Rescue Committee company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor Free Russia Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Free Russia Foundation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while International Rescue Committee company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Free Russia Foundation company nor International Rescue Committee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Rescue Committee company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Free Russia Foundation company.

International Rescue Committee company employs more people globally than Free Russia Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Free Russia Foundation nor International Rescue Committee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N