Comparison Overview
Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle

Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle
21 rue du Mont Thabor, Paris, France, 75001, FR
Last Update: 18/02/2026
The creation of Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle in 2000 heralded a return to luxury perfumery. At a time when perfumers remained relatively unknown, Frédéric Malle created a brand that draws perfumers out of the shadows and into the light, where they could finally be...

Tiffany & Co.
727 5th Ave, New York, 10022, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
In 1837 Charles Lewis Tiffany founded his company in New York City where his store was soon acclaimed as the palace of jewels for its exceptional gemstones. Since then TIFFANY & CO. has become synonymous with elegance, innovative design, fine craftsmanship and creative ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle







Tiffany & Co.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
Tiffany & Co. has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tiffany & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tiffany & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle

Tiffany & Co.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.