Comparison Overview
Fraport AG
Fraport AG
Frankfurt am Main, 60547, DE
Last Update: 14/03/2026
Die Fraport AG gehört zu den international führenden Unternehmen im Airport-Business und ist an 29 Flughäfen auf vier Kontinenten aktiv. Im Jahr 2025 begrüßte Fraport am Flughafen Frankfurt 63,2 Millionen Passagiere. Das Cargo-Volumen lag bei rund 2,1 Millionen Tonnen. ...
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
Level 1, Tower C, Global Business Park,, Gurgaon, 122 002, IN
Last Update: 07/10/2026
IndiGo is India’s largest passenger airline. We operate with focus on our three pillars – offering low fares, being on-time and delivering a courteous and hassle-free experience. IndiGo has become synonymous with being on-time. Since our inception in August 2006, we ha...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Fraport AG
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fraport AG in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) in 2026.
Incident History - Fraport AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fraport AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Fraport AG
IndiGo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.