Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fraport AGFraport AG
VS
EmiratesEmirates
Fraport AG

Fraport AG

Frankfurt am Main, 60547, DE

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fraport.com
763/1000Fair

Die Fraport AG gehört zu den international führenden Unternehmen im Airport-Business und ist an 29 Flughäfen auf vier Kontinenten aktiv. Im Jahr 2025 begrüßte Fraport am Flughafen Frankfurt 63,2 Millionen Passagiere. Das Cargo-Volumen lag bei rund 2,1 Millionen Tonnen. ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:3,198
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Emirates

Emirates

Dubai, Dubai, AE, 686

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.emirates.com
827/1000Good

Based in Dubai, the Emirates Group employs over 120,000 staff from more than 170 nationalities. The Emirates Group’s extensive and diverse international portfolio includes the world’s largest international airline, Emirates, and one of the largest combined air services ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:66,627
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fraport AG

Fraport AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Emirates

Emirates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fraport AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emirates in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Fraport AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fraport AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Emirates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emirates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fraport AG

Fraport AG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Emirates

Emirates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fraport AG company and Emirates company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fraport AG and Emirates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fraport AG and Emirates, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fraport AG or Emirates ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fraport AG or Emirates ?
Between Fraport AG and Emirates, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fraport AG and Emirates, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9