Comparison Overview
Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld

Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld
Kiskerstraße 26, Bielefeld, 33615, DE
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Das Franziskus Hospital in Bielefeld ist ein innovatives Unternehmen im Gesundheitswesen und gehört zusammen mit dem Sank Elisabeth Hospital in Gütersloh, dem Mathilden Hospital in Herford, dem Sankt Vinzenz Hospital in Rheda-Wiedenbrück, dem Marienhospital in Oelde und...

Mayo Clinic
200 First St. S.W., Rochester, 55905, US
Last Update: 08/06/2026
Mayo Clinic has expanded and changed in many ways, but our values remain true to the vision of our founders. Our primary value – The needs of the patient come first – guides our plans and decisions as we create the future of health care. Join us and you'll find a cultur...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld







Mayo Clinic






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Mayo Clinic has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mayo Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mayo Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld

Mayo Clinic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/blob/1de9ae146cd63c209e8c3fd81611a4ed2472971b/ivp/src/lib_logutils/SplitHandler.cpp#L189
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/commit/6f0619e905b325d6b88f76425673045c6e4f6f94
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/pull/137
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ivp-through-24.8.1-alog-splitting-path-traversal-on-windows
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Comms/MOOSCommPkt.cpp#L228
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/d30c14585753f9ae39749d9628ed15c8383f0568
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/75
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-out-of-bounds-read-via-short-packet
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Utils/MOOSSerialPort.cpp#L595
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/befb04df2039d0080715ea35f56268092db4ec0f
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/73
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-off-by-one-buffer-overflow-in-serial-telegram-handling
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/DB/HTTPConnection.cpp#L460
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/a3f26f099bb08decb143f704d8b1ca16ae405b44
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/78
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-http-pages-stored-cross-site-scripting
MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/blob/50b9c6c65169c501f746cfef1e167f74a7735e74/Tools/Graphical/uMS/ScopeTabPane.cpp#L243
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/commit/a6ebc0bc6cb360315ce620e865f996d189cddb0e
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/pull/5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ui-moos-through-50b9c6c-ums-buffer-overflow-via-long-moos-identifiers