Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FPT PhilippinesFPT Philippines
VS
TietoevryTietoevry
FPT Philippines

FPT Philippines

Geonzon, Cebu, 6000, PH

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://fptsoftware.com
750/1000Fair

FPT Software is a global technology and IT services provider headquartered in Vietnam, with USD 1.34 billion in revenue (2025) and over 33,000 employees in 30+ countries. As an AI-first company, FPT Software enables breakthrough speed, scalability and quality through AI...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

Helsinki, FI-02101, FI

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tietoevry.com
731/1000Moderate

In a rapidly changing world, technology is everything. It's in the fabric of society. In every part of every business. At the very heart of human evolution. It’s a great power that comes with great responsibility. At Tietoevry, we believe it’s time to shift perspective...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:8,748
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FPT Philippines

FPT Philippines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FPT Philippines in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tietoevry in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FPT Philippines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FPT Philippines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tietoevry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tietoevry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FPT Philippines

FPT Philippines

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tietoevry

Tietoevry

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TIE224771222

FAQ

Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FPT Philippines company and Tietoevry company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FPT Philippines and Tietoevry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FPT Philippines and Tietoevry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FPT Philippines or Tietoevry ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FPT Philippines or Tietoevry ?
Between FPT Philippines and Tietoevry, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FPT Philippines and Tietoevry, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8