Comparison Overview
FPT Slovakia

FPT Slovakia
Južná trieda 6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia, Kosice, 040 01, SK
Last Update: 26/04/2026
FPT Slovakia have been providing services with a focus on Information Technology from Košice, Slovakia since 2004. We currently employ more than 400 IT specialists. Our main tasks include design, development and management of software, implementation and maintenance of...

Softtek
Ave. Constitución 3098 Col. Santa María, 6th Floor, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX, 64650
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Founded in 1982 by a small group of entrepreneurs, Softtek started out in Mexico providing local IT services, and today is a global leader in next-generation digital solutions. The first company to introduce the Nearshore model, Softtek helps Global 2000 organizations b...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

FPT Slovakia







Softtek






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FPT Slovakia in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Softtek in 2026.
Incident History - FPT Slovakia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FPT Slovakia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Softtek (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Softtek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

FPT Slovakia

Softtek
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.