Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FPL Energy Services, Inc.FPL Energy Services, Inc.
VS
CB&ICB&I
FPL Energy Services, Inc.

FPL Energy Services, Inc.

N/A

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
745/1000Moderate

FPL Energy Services, Inc. is a leading provider of reliable solutions for Florida businesses and governmental customers. Headquartered in South Florida, FPL Energy Services is an unregulated subsidiary of Florida Power & Light Company (a NextEra Energy Company), the thi...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:118
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CB&I

CB&I

1725 Hughes Landing Blvd, The Woodlands, 77380, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cbi.com/
772/1000Fair

CB&I is the world’s leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout its 135+ year history, CB&I has the global expertise and strategically located operations to provide its customers world-c...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:11,368
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FPL Energy Services, Inc.

FPL Energy Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CB&I

CB&I

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FPL Energy Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CB&I in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FPL Energy Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FPL Energy Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CB&I (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CB&I cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FPL Energy Services, Inc.

FPL Energy Services, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CB&I

CB&I

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. company and CB&I company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. and CB&I, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. and CB&I, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FPL Energy Services, Inc. or CB&I ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FPL Energy Services, Inc. or CB&I ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. and CB&I, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FPL Energy Services, Inc. and CB&I, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2