Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Foxsemicon Technology LLCFoxsemicon Technology LLC
VS
Marvell TechnologyMarvell Technology
Foxsemicon Technology LLC

Foxsemicon Technology LLC

34585 7th St, Union City, 94587, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
692/1000Weak

Foxsemicon - established in April 2001 and listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in July 2015 - is a Foxconn (Hon Hai) Group Invested Company. Its headquarter located in Chunan Science Park, Taiwan. the company's production sites are in Chunan, Kunshan, Jiangsu, and Songj...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 17/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marvell.com
832/1000Good

We believe that infrastructure powers progress. That execution is as essential as innovation. That better collaboration builds better technology. At Marvell, We go all in with you. Focused and determined, we unite behind your goals as our own. We leverage our unrivaled...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:10,728
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Foxsemicon Technology LLC

Foxsemicon Technology LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxsemicon Technology LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marvell Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Foxsemicon Technology LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxsemicon Technology LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marvell Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marvell Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Foxsemicon Technology LLC

Foxsemicon Technology LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FOX1770473554
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Foxsemicon Technology LLC or Marvell Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Foxsemicon Technology LLC or Marvell Technology ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC and Marvell Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Foxsemicon Technology LLC and Marvell Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1