Comparison Overview
Foxit Developer Solutions

Foxit Developer Solutions
41841 Albrae St, Fremont, California, 94538, US
Last Update: 27/04/2026
Foxit Software is the leading provider of fast, affordable, and secure PDF development solutions. These can be used to implement PDF functionality in almost any application, across a variety of platforms and environments. Our team is made up of pioneers and experts wi...

Bolt
Tallinn, EE
Last Update: 22/04/2026
At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Foxit Developer Solutions







Bolt






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foxit Developer Solutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Bolt has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Foxit Developer Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foxit Developer Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Foxit Developer Solutions

Bolt
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.