Comparison Overview
Four Points by Sheraton
Four Points by Sheraton
Four Points, White Plains, 10604, US
Last Update: 24/01/2026
Four Points® (select-service hotels) delights the self-sufficient traveler with a new kind of comfort, approachable style and spirited, can-do service — all at the honest value our guests deserve. Our guests start their day feeling energized and finish up relaxed and fr...
Marriott International
10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, MD, US, 20817
Last Update: 03/07/2026
Marriott International, Inc. is based in Bethesda, Maryland, USA, and encompasses a portfolio of approximately 9,000 properties across more than 30 leading brands in 141 countries and territories. Its heritage can be traced to a root beer stand opened in Washington, D....
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Four Points by Sheraton
Marriott International
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Four Points by Sheraton in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
Marriott International has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Four Points by Sheraton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Four Points by Sheraton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Marriott International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Marriott International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Four Points by Sheraton
Marriott International
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.