Comparison Overview

Fosun 复星

VS

Australia Post

Fosun 复星

600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, CN, 200010
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fosun.com

Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilling the needs for families in health, happiness, and wealth. In 2007, Fosun International Limited was listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX stock code: 00656). As of 31 December 2024, Fosun International's total assets amounted to RMB796.5 billion and it received an AA MSCI ESG rating.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 17,419
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Australia Post

111 Bourke St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://http://auspost.com.au/

Connecting businesses with consumers is the heart of commercial prosperity and the cornerstone of Australia Post's commitment to Australian businesses. As connectivity transforms our lives, Australia Post is evolving to meet the future needs of businesses by providing trusted service solutions in etailing, retailing, communications, financial services and postal. Continuous improvement of these services is our relentless objective. On LinkedIn, Australia Post only collects, uses and stores your personal information that relates to providing information in response to your queries. Without this information, Australia Post will be unable to look into your query. Your personal information may also be disclosed to third party service providers to facilitate this process. Your personal information is managed in accordance with Australia Post’s Privacy Policy. This sets out how you may seek access to and correction of your personal information and how to make complaints. A copy is available at auspost.com.au/privacy. Australia Post may only disclose the information provided by you if required or authorised by law, or in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Please refer to the Privacy Policy or contact the Privacy Contact Officer, Australia Post, GPO Box 1777, Melbourne, Vic 3000 for any privacy related queries.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 16,394
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fosun 复星
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australia Post
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2026.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australia Post in 2026.

Incident History — Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australia Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australia Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fosun-group.jpeg
Fosun 复星
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Australia Post company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fosun 复星 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australia Post company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fosun 复星 company.

In the current year, Australia Post company and Fosun 复星 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australia Post company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australia Post company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australia Post company nor Fosun 复星 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 company nor Australia Post company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fosun 复星 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Australia Post company.

Fosun 复星 company employs more people globally than Australia Post company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fosun 复星 nor Australia Post holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References