Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FoschiniFoschini
VS
Stop & ShopStop & Shop
Foschini

Foschini

340 Voortrekker Rd, Stanley Lewis Centre, Cape Town, Western Cape, ZA, 7500

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Foschini is a South African fashion and beauty brand that has catered to the needs of women since 1925 because we believe in the progression of South Africa and the epic women who are building its future. Today, we continue to celebrate this by partnering with these wom...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:434
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stop & Shop

Stop & Shop

1385 Hancock St, Quincy, MA, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://stopandshop.com/
789/1000Fair

Stop & Shop has been around for more than 100 years. We started small, as a corner grocery store back in 1914. And we’ve grown…a lot. We have more than 50,000 Associates in 350+ stores throughout Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, and New Jersey. Throug...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:17,745
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Foschini

Foschini

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stop & Shop

Stop & Shop

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foschini in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stop & Shop in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Foschini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foschini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stop & Shop (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stop & Shop cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Foschini

Foschini

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stop & Shop

Stop & Shop

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Foschini company and Stop & Shop company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Foschini and Stop & Shop, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Foschini and Stop & Shop, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Foschini or Stop & Shop ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Foschini or Stop & Shop ?
Between Foschini and Stop & Shop, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Foschini and Stop & Shop, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA