Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forvis Mazars in the Czech RepublicForvis Mazars in the Czech Republic
VS
S&P GlobalS&P Global
Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

Pod dráhou, Prague 7, Prague, 170 00, CZ

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Forvis Mazars Group SC is an independent member of Forvis Mazars Global, a leading global professional services network. Operating as an internationally integrated partnership in over 100 countries and territories, Forvis Mazars Group specialises in audit, tax and advi...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:146
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
S&P Global

S&P Global

55 Water Street, New York, 10041, US

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spglobal.com
791/1000Fair

S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) enables businesses, governments, and individuals with trusted data, expertise and technology to make decisions with conviction. We are Advancing Essential Intelligence through world-leading benchmarks, data, and insights that customers need in or...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:40,696
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
S&P Global

S&P Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

S&P Global has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - S&P Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&P Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
S&P Global

S&P Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LITSPGGUECHE1777407909

FAQ

Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic company and S&P Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic and S&P Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic and S&P Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic or S&P Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic or S&P Global ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic and S&P Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forvis Mazars in the Czech Republic and S&P Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA