Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forvis Mazars no BrasilForvis Mazars no Brasil
VS
PwC UKPwC UK
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Avenida Francisco Matarazzo 1350, São Paulo, São Paulo 05001-100, BR

Last Update: 05/11/2025

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Forvis Mazars Group SC is an independent member of Forvis Mazars Global, a leading global network of professional services. Operating as an internationally integrated partnership in over 100 countries and territories, Forvis Mazars Group specializes in audit, tax consu...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PwC UK

PwC UK

1 Embankment Place, London, London, GB, WC2N 6RH

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
782/1000Fair

Welcome to the PwC UK Linkedin page, bringing you updates and insights from our work and our people. We are founded on a culture of partnership with a strong commercial focus. This is reflected in our purpose: To build trust in society and solve important problems. O...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:10,965
Subsidiaries:79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PwC UK

PwC UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forvis Mazars no Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forvis Mazars no Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forvis Mazars no Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PwC UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PwC UK

PwC UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and PwC UK company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and PwC UK, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and PwC UK, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forvis Mazars no Brasil or PwC UK ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forvis Mazars no Brasil or PwC UK ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and PwC UK, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and PwC UK, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9