Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forvis Mazars no BrasilForvis Mazars no Brasil
VS
KPMGKPMG
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Avenida Francisco Matarazzo 1350, São Paulo, São Paulo 05001-100, BR

Last Update: 05/11/2025

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Forvis Mazars Group SC is an independent member of Forvis Mazars Global, a leading global network of professional services. Operating as an internationally integrated partnership in over 100 countries and territories, Forvis Mazars Group specializes in audit, tax consu...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KPMG

KPMG

Worldwide, CA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com
832/1000Good

KPMG is a global organization of independent professional services firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. KPMG is the brand under which the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”) operate and provide professional services. “KPMG” is ...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:238,915
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPMG

KPMG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forvis Mazars no Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forvis Mazars no Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forvis Mazars no Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPMG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Forvis Mazars no Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KPMG

KPMG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil company and KPMG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forvis Mazars no Brasil or KPMG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forvis Mazars no Brasil or KPMG ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and KPMG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forvis Mazars no Brasil and KPMG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA