Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forvis Mazars in BelgiumForvis Mazars in Belgium
VS
SynchronySynchrony
Forvis Mazars in Belgium

Forvis Mazars in Belgium

Marcel Thirylaan 77 - b4, Brussels, undefined, 1200, BE

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Forvis Mazars is a leading provider of audit & assurance, tax, advisory & consulting services worldwide. Operating in over 100 countries and territories, we blend scale, capacity, and coverage with agility, profound insight, and a tailored approach. Our 40,000+ strong...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:239
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Synchrony

Synchrony

HQ, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06902

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.synchrony.com
778/1000Fair

At Synchrony, our driving force is to be essential to people's everyday lives by making it easier for the many millions of people who rely on us to access their essential needs and everyday wants with consumer financing that works for them – from their first credit card...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,772
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forvis Mazars in Belgium

Forvis Mazars in Belgium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Synchrony

Synchrony

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forvis Mazars in Belgium in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synchrony in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forvis Mazars in Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forvis Mazars in Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Synchrony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synchrony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forvis Mazars in Belgium

Forvis Mazars in Belgium

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Synchrony

Synchrony

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN304072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN645080425

FAQ

Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium company and Synchrony company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forvis Mazars in Belgium or Synchrony ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forvis Mazars in Belgium or Synchrony ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium and Synchrony, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forvis Mazars in Belgium and Synchrony, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8