Comparison Overview

FORVIA HELLA

VS

MAHLE

FORVIA HELLA

Rixbecker Strasse 75, Lippstadt, undefined, 59552, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hella.com

FORVIA HELLA is a listed, international automotive supplier. Coming together with Faurecia in the FORVIA Group, we build the world's seventh largest supplier of automotive technologies. As a global market leader in high-growth areas, FORVIA employs 157,000 people worldwide. FORVIA HELLA therein stands for high-performance lighting technology and automotive electronics. At the same time, we cover a broad service and product portfolio for the spare parts and workshop business as well as for manufacturers of special vehicles with our Business Group Lifecycle Solutions. With around 37,500 employees at over 125 locations, the Company is active worldwide and generated adjusted sales of € 8.1 billion in the fiscal year 2023. www.forvia-hella.com Legal notice: https://www.hella.com/legalnotice Data protection notice: https://www.hella.com/hella-com/en/Data-protection-65.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,413
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MAHLE

Pragstrasse 26-46, Stuttgart, DE, D-70376
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mahle.com/dataprivacy

MAHLE is a leading international development partner and supplier to the automotive industry with customers in both passenger car and commercial vehicle sectors. Founded in 1920, the technology group is working on the climate-neutral mobility of tomorrow, with a focus on the strategic areas of electrification and thermal management as well as further technology fields to reduce CO2 emissions, such as fuel cells or highly efficient combustion engines that also run on hydrogen or synthetic fuels. Today, one in every two vehicles globally is equipped with MAHLE components. For privacy statement and imprint follow the website link below.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 21,435
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forviahella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mahle.jpeg
MAHLE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FORVIA HELLA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MAHLE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA HELLA in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAHLE in 2025.

Incident History — FORVIA HELLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA HELLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MAHLE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAHLE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forviahella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mahle.jpeg
MAHLE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MAHLE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FORVIA HELLA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MAHLE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FORVIA HELLA company.

In the current year, MAHLE company and FORVIA HELLA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MAHLE company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MAHLE company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MAHLE company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA company nor MAHLE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both MAHLE company and FORVIA HELLA company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

MAHLE company employs more people globally than FORVIA HELLA company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FORVIA HELLA nor MAHLE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References