Comparison Overview

FORVIA

VS

Nissan Motor Corporation

FORVIA

None
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.forvia.com

FORVIA comprises the complementary technology and industrial strengths of Faurecia and HELLA. With over 249 industrial sites and 78 R&D centers, 150,000 people, including more than 15,000 engineers across 40+ countries, FORVIA provides a unique and comprehensive approach to the automotive challenges of today and tomorrow. Composed of 6 business groups with 24 product lines, and a strong IP portfolio of over 12,900 patents, FORVIA is focused on becoming the preferred innovation and integration partner for OEMs worldwide. FORVIA aims to be a change maker committed to foreseeing and making the mobility transformation happen.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 58,470
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nissan Motor Corporation

1-1, Takashima 1-chome,, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP, 220-8686
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 0 and 549
http://www.nissan-global.com

Nissan Motor Corporation is a global car manufacturer that sells a full line of vehicles under the Nissan and INFINITI brands. Nissan’s global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan, manages operations in four regions: Japan-ASEAN, China, Americas, and AMIEO (Africa, Middle East, India, Europe & Oceania). For more information about our products, services and commitment to sustainable mobility, visit nissan-global.com. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and see all our latest videos on YouTube.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 46,350
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FORVIA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nissan Motor Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA in 2026.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Nissan Motor Corporation has 40.12% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — FORVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nissan Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nissan Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forvia.jpeg
FORVIA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Initial access via weak/stolen credentials, insider recruitment, or remote access tools
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom demand)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to data servers
Motivation: Data theft and extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FORVIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than FORVIA company.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FORVIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FORVIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while FORVIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither FORVIA company nor Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FORVIA company.

FORVIA company employs more people globally than Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FORVIA nor Nissan Motor Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References