Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FORVIAFORVIA
VS
Motherson GroupMotherson Group
FORVIA

FORVIA

N/A

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.forvia.com
754/1000Fair

FORVIA comprises the complementary technology and industrial strengths of Faurecia and HELLA. With over 249 industrial sites and 78 R&D centers, 150,000 people, including more than 15,000 engineers across 40+ countries, FORVIA provides a unique and comprehensive approac...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:59,825
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

Plot number 1, Noida, 201301, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.motherson.com
777/1000Fair

Motherson is a diversified global design, engineering, manufacturing and assembly (DEMA) specialist, delivering full-system solutions to customers across a wide range of industries. With a robust network of 425 state-of-the-art facilities across 44 countries, and a dedi...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:23,207
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
FORVIA

FORVIA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motherson Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - FORVIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Motherson Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motherson Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
FORVIA

FORVIA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Motherson Group

Motherson Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between FORVIA company and Motherson Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between FORVIA and Motherson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between FORVIA and Motherson Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - FORVIA or Motherson Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - FORVIA or Motherson Group ?
Between FORVIA and Motherson Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between FORVIA and Motherson Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3