Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Fortra MFTFortra MFT
VS
Pitney BowesPitney Bowes
Fortra MFT

Fortra MFT

11095 Viking Dr, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, US, 55344

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fortra.com/MFT
753/1000Fair

Fortra MFT delivers market-leading file transfer solutions that IT teams trust to modernize file transfers, eliminate bottlenecks, streamline workflows and processes, and secure enterprise-wide operations. We serve over 6,000 customers worldwide across Financial Servic...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

27 Waterview Dr, Shelton, 06484, US

Last Update: 27/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.pitneybowes.com/us
500/1000Critical

Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entiti...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,782
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Fortra MFT

Fortra MFT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortra MFT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Pitney Bowes has 194.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Fortra MFT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortra MFT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Fortra MFT

Fortra MFT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INDPITCARBASZARHAL1777466463
🔒 Incident : Breach
PIT1777335822
🔒 Incident : Breach
CARHOLPRI1776630318

FAQ

Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Fortra MFT company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Fortra MFT and Pitney Bowes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Fortra MFT and Pitney Bowes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Fortra MFT or Pitney Bowes ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Fortra MFT or Pitney Bowes ?
Between Fortra MFT and Pitney Bowes, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Fortra MFT and Pitney Bowes, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103047
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103046
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension: before 1.46.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103045
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Refreshed skin allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - Refreshed skin: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103044
SUMMARY

XML injection (aka blind XPath injection) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension allows XML Injection. This issue affects Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103043
SUMMARY

anchorme through 3.0.8 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in the IPv6 host extraction regex due to catastrophic backtracking. Attackers can supply specially crafted input strings with repeated patterns to cause exponential regex engine backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop and denying service to other requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES