Comparison Overview
Fort Knox

Fort Knox
Rua Teresa Toedtli, 215, São Paulo, 04311-030, BR
Last Update: 15/02/2026
Empresa especializada em soluções personalizadas de Segurança Privada, contando com serviços de Vigilância Patrimonial, Segurança Pessoal e Segurança Eletrônica. Neste último, encontram-se as soluções de CFTV, Controle de Acesso, Monitoramento Remoto de Imagens e de Ala...

GardaWorld
2300 Émile-Bélanger, Saint-Laurent , H4R 3J4, CA
Last Update: 01/04/2026
GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fort Knox







GardaWorld






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fort Knox in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GardaWorld in 2026.
Incident History - Fort Knox (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fort Knox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GardaWorld (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GardaWorld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fort Knox

GardaWorld
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.