Comparison Overview
Fortinet Partner

Fortinet Partner
899 E Kifer Rd, Sunnyvale, 94086, US
Last Update: 15/03/2026
Fortinet partners with the most innovative, industry-leading companies to ensure our customers are connected to the expertise, services, and technologies they need. The goal of the Fortinet Engage Partner Program is to accelerate business and drive growth and profit by...

inDrive
Mountain View, 94040, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Fortinet Partner







inDrive






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fortinet Partner in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.
Incident History - Fortinet Partner (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fortinet Partner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)
inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Fortinet Partner

inDrive
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.