Comparison Overview

Swedish Armed Forces

VS

US Navy

Swedish Armed Forces

Lidingövägen 24, Stockholm, SE, 107 85
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

The Swedish Armed Forces is one of the biggest authorities in Sweden and is headed by a Supreme Commander. The deputy leader of the authority is the Director General. As the only authority permitted to engage in armed combat, the Swedish Armed Forces are Sweden’s ultimate security policy resource. The Armed Forces are therefore always prepared to carry out international missions, assert Sweden’s national integrity and support Swedish society in major crises. To enable Sweden to maintain its freedom of action in terms of its security policy, the Armed Forces are continuously developing capabilities that can meet future requirements. The Swedish Armed Forces is subject to the Swedish parliament and the Swedish government. As an authority we are governed by laws and regulations passed by them and they also determine the budget we receive. Swedish citizenship is a requirement for joining the Swedish Armed Forces. At present this applies to both military and civilian service.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 14,657
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

US Navy

1200 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC, US, 20350
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The United States is a maritime nation, and the U.S. Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American interests around the globe, the U.S. Navy must remain prepared to execute our timeless role, as directed by Congress and the President.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 158,925
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forsvarsmakten.jpeg
Swedish Armed Forces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swedish Armed Forces
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Navy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedish Armed Forces in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Navy in 2025.

Incident History — Swedish Armed Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedish Armed Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forsvarsmakten.jpeg
Swedish Armed Forces
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-navy.jpeg
US Navy
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Disclosure of Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Swedish Armed Forces company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to US Navy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Navy company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Swedish Armed Forces company.

In the current year, US Navy company and Swedish Armed Forces company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Navy company nor Swedish Armed Forces company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

US Navy company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Swedish Armed Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both US Navy company and Swedish Armed Forces company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

US Navy company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Swedish Armed Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Navy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swedish Armed Forces company.

US Navy company employs more people globally than Swedish Armed Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swedish Armed Forces nor US Navy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H