Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ForsitForsit
VS
GoTo GroupGoTo Group
Forsit

Forsit

Teheran-ro 7-gil 22, Lv9, Seoul, 06130, KR

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.forsit.co.kr
751/1000Fair

We're turning Korean brands into global leaders by accelerating global e-commerce. Forsit started small back in November 2019 – just one person with a big idea. Now, in December 2023, we're a team of 80 and growing, all without external funding. Despite the rich dive...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:44
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

Jakarta, ID

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gotocompany.com/
797/1000Fair

GoTo is the largest technology group in Indonesia, combining on-demand and financial services through the Gojek and GoTo Financial brands. It is the first platform in Southeast Asia to host these two essential use cases in one ecosystem, capturing a majority of Indonesi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:17,853
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forsit

Forsit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forsit in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoTo Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forsit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forsit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GoTo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoTo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forsit

Forsit

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GoTo Group

GoTo Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forsit company and GoTo Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forsit and GoTo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forsit and GoTo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forsit or GoTo Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forsit or GoTo Group ?
Between Forsit and GoTo Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forsit and GoTo Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES