Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forrester CX EventsForrester CX Events
VS
RR DonnelleyRR Donnelley
Forrester CX Events

Forrester CX Events

New York City, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Forrester’s CX events bring CX, B2C marketing, and digital leaders together to gain the insight and direction needed to strengthen customer experiences, lead change with clarity, and turn ideas into action. Join us in a city near you: • CX Summit EMEA, Amsterdam, Ju...

NAICS:5418
NAICS Definition:Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

227 W Monroe St, Chicago, 60606, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rrd.com
726/1000Moderate

RRD provides a complete portfolio of marketing, packaging, print and business services to the world’s most respected brands, including 91% of the Fortune 100. Our proprietary technology, advanced data analytics and established expertise fuel organizational decision-ma...

NAICS:5418
NAICS Definition:Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services
Employees:40,800
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forrester CX Events

Forrester CX Events

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forrester CX Events in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RR Donnelley in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forrester CX Events (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forrester CX Events cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RR Donnelley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RR Donnelley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forrester CX Events

Forrester CX Events

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RR Donnelley

RR Donnelley

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RR-435072725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RRD31219222
🔒 Incident : Breach
RR-1011091725

FAQ

Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forrester CX Events company and RR Donnelley company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forrester CX Events and RR Donnelley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forrester CX Events and RR Donnelley, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forrester CX Events or RR Donnelley ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forrester CX Events or RR Donnelley ?
Between Forrester CX Events and RR Donnelley, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forrester CX Events and RR Donnelley, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2