Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

For EyesFor Eyes
VS
no oneno one
For Eyes

For Eyes

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.foreyes.com/careers
757/1000Fair

For Eyes was founded in 1972 in Philadelphia, PA on the foundation that an optical store should have a friendly open environment with high-quality brands and products with great pricing. Throughout the years, For Eyes has grown to 103 stores across the United States and...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:412
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
no one

no one

RU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.noone.ru
857/1000Very Good

Компания NO ONE более 20 лет занимает лидирующие позиции в розничном сегменте. NO ONE – один из крупнейших дистрибьюторов обуви и аксессуаров ведущих европейских брендов на российском рынке. В портфеле компании NO ONE около 50 европейских марок: Casadei, Fabi, Vici...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,007
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
For Eyes

For Eyes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
no one

no one

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for For Eyes in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for no one in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - For Eyes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

For Eyes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - no one (X = Date, Y = Severity)

no one cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
For Eyes

For Eyes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
no one

no one

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between For Eyes company and no one company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between For Eyes and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between For Eyes and no one, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - For Eyes or no one ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - For Eyes or no one ?
Between For Eyes and no one, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between For Eyes and no one, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES