Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Forestry CommissionForestry Commission
VS
Department of Health (Philippines)Department of Health (Philippines)
Forestry Commission

Forestry Commission

620 Bristol Business Park, Bristol, BS16 1EJ, GB

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile

What do we do? We provide grants, licences and advice to private woodland owners to encourage new tree planting and to help keep private forests under sustainable management. Our plant health officers inspect wood imports at ports to minimise the risk from foreign pe...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,425
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila City, 1014, PH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.doh.gov.ph/
782/1000Fair

The Philippine Department of Health (abbreviated as DOH; Filipino: Kagawaran ng Kalusugan) is the executive department of the Philippine government responsible for ensuring access to basic public health services by all Filipinos through the provision of quality health c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,478
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Forestry Commission

Forestry Commission

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forestry Commission in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Health (Philippines) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Forestry Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forestry Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Department of Health (Philippines) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Health (Philippines) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Forestry Commission

Forestry Commission

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Department of Health (Philippines)

Department of Health (Philippines)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Forestry Commission company and Department of Health (Philippines) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Forestry Commission and Department of Health (Philippines), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Forestry Commission and Department of Health (Philippines), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Forestry Commission or Department of Health (Philippines) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Forestry Commission or Department of Health (Philippines) ?
Between Forestry Commission and Department of Health (Philippines), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Forestry Commission and Department of Health (Philippines), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA