Comparison Overview
Ford Finland

Ford Finland
Äyritie, Vantaa, 01510, FI
Last Update: 14/02/2026
Oy Ford Ab on vuonna 1926 perustettu Ford-merkkisten henkilöautojen ja hyötyajoneuvojen sekä varaosien maahantuoja ja tukkumyyjä. Yritys on osa kansainvälistä Ford Motor Companya, jonka palveluksessa on maailmanlaajuisesti lähes 200 000 henkilöä. Suomessa Oy Ford Ab työ...

LEONI
Marienstraße 5, Nürnberg, 90402, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
LEONI is a global provider of products, solutions and services for energy and data management in the automotive industry. The group of companies has around 87,000 employees in 21 countries and generated consolidated sales of EUR 5 billion in 2024. The partnership betwee...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Ford Finland







LEONI






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ford Finland in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LEONI in 2026.
Incident History - Ford Finland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ford Finland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LEONI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LEONI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Ford Finland

LEONI
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.