Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ford AustriaFord Austria
VS
General MotorsGeneral Motors
Ford Austria

Ford Austria

Grünbergstraße 15, Wien, 1120, AT

Last Update: 11/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.ford.at/
747/1000Moderate

Ford - Bereit für Morgen

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
General Motors

General Motors

100 Renaissance Center, Detroit, 48243, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.gm.com
723/1000Moderate

General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:110,879
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ford Austria

Ford Austria

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
General Motors

General Motors

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Austria in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

General Motors has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ford Austria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Austria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - General Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ford Austria

Ford Austria

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
General Motors

General Motors

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GENMINGEN1789131033
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GEN1779899842
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PTC1774441546

FAQ

Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ford Austria company and General Motors company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ford Austria and General Motors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ford Austria and General Motors, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ford Austria or General Motors ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ford Austria or General Motors ?
Between Ford Austria and General Motors, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ford Austria and General Motors, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES