Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ford AustraliaFord Australia
VS
StellantisStellantis
Ford Australia

Ford Australia

600 Victoria St, Richmond, 3121, AU

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.ford.com.au/
749/1000Moderate

From our five locations across Victoria to our regional offices, dealers and customers in more than 180 markets around the world, Ford Australia is more than meets the eye. We design, engineer, and import award-winning and best-selling cars, SUVs and trucks, with our Au...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:348
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stellantis

Stellantis

Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.stellantis.com
594/1000Very Poor

Our storied and iconic brands embody the passion of their visionary founders and today’s customers in their innovative products and services: they include Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, DS Automobiles, Fiat, Jeep®, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram, Va...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:113,145
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ford Australia

Ford Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stellantis

Stellantis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stellantis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ford Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stellantis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stellantis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ford Australia

Ford Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stellantis

Stellantis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STE1766793304
🔒 Incident : Breach
STE4792047100725
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REN2632226100625

FAQ

Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ford Australia company and Stellantis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ford Australia and Stellantis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ford Australia and Stellantis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ford Australia or Stellantis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ford Australia or Stellantis ?
Between Ford Australia and Stellantis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ford Australia and Stellantis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES