Comparison Overview
Footpatrol

Footpatrol
80 Berwick Street, London, W1F 8, GB
Last Update: 27/02/2026
The UK's original and world renowned destination sneaker store, Footpatrol originally opened in 2002 and relocated to the current store location in 2010. Always at the heart of supplying the global culture with the most desirable footwear, apparel and accessories, Footp...

Pilot Flying J
5508 Lonas Rd., Knoxville, 37909, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Company Overview Headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, Pilot Flying J is the largest operator of travel centers in North America with more than 750 locations throughout the United States and Canada and employs more than 24,000 Team Members. Pilot Flying J services over...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Footpatrol







Pilot Flying J






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Footpatrol in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pilot Flying J in 2026.
Incident History - Footpatrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Footpatrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pilot Flying J (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pilot Flying J cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Footpatrol

Pilot Flying J
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.