Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

FootactionFootaction
VS
The TJX Companies, Inc.The TJX Companies, Inc.
Footaction

Footaction

New York City, 10001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.footaction.com/
772/1000Fair

Footaction is a subsidiary of Foot Locker. We live at the intersection of sports and style to serve those who are steps ahead of the latest trends. We offer looks that include the newest releases, exclusive apparel collections, and some of the biggest names in sportswe...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:611
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, 01701, US

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.tjx.com/
846/1000Good

TJX is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the U.S. and worldwide, with four global home offices, seven brands, nearly 4,700 stores in nine countries, and five distinctive branded e-commerce sites. As Associates, we make a difference with our con...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:54,102
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Footaction

Footaction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Footaction in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The TJX Companies, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Footaction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Footaction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The TJX Companies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The TJX Companies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Footaction

Footaction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The TJX Companies, Inc.

The TJX Companies, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Footaction company and The TJX Companies, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Footaction and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Footaction and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Footaction or The TJX Companies, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Footaction or The TJX Companies, Inc. ?
Between Footaction and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Footaction and The TJX Companies, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1